As of today, Seattle projects must calculate greenhouse gas emissions in SEPA (is mitigation next?)
Monday, March 31st, 2008As of today, any project in Seattle that trips a SEPA review will need to calculate its greenhouse gas emissions.
What do you think? Is this a good move or is it impinging on your rights? Should the city, county and state move in this direction, and if not, what would you tell them to do?
I’ve written about this subject pretty extensively since King County kicked off the crusade last June. Back then, King County Executive Ron Sims declared his intentions to connect developments to greenhouse gasses in an executive order. To read that story, click here.
As the deadline for action neared, I spoke with representatives of local business groups NAIOP, AGC and the Master Builders Association. They told me what their concerns were about the process. To read that story, click here.
Then Seattle began considering the changes, read about it here, and Washington State Department of Ecology Director Jay Manning advised anybody seeking a permit to start considering the same questions, read that one here.
Now, Seattle’s day has finally come. Seattle is using the same checklist that King County has had in place, though there may be some tweaks to it. To see a draft of the checklist, go here. DPD has also devoted a whole Web site to today’s changes. To see that site, visit here.

e are green rock stars in the national sustainability movement, three of them are coming to Seattle/the Pacific Northwest in April. 
So you know what the greenest projects in the Puget Sound are…. but what about the country? If you want to find out, the AIA will host a reception in Seattle FOR FREE on April 6 that features submissions and project judging for the year’s AIA COTE Top Ten Green Projects.
de Glenn Murcutt, winner of the 2002 Pritzker Prize. The award winners will be not be announced until Earth Day.
It’s called smart energy - the idea behind it is the energy used in your home or building will interface with the grid the same way your Internet can interface with a well tuned entertainment system. You tell the Internet what you want - it gets it for you without your worrying about the specifics. At an
So here’s my challenge for you: answer what exactly needs to change and how. I want to know what general issues are problematic, how code makes it difficult to build green or incorporate green features, and what you would change to make the process easier. I welcome personal experiences and third-party stories, comparisons working in other jurisdictions or just ideas. It can be about residential, office, mixed-use, etc. I’d also welcome comments from areas outside Seattle (or Washington for that matter).
Humans aren’t perfect. Machinery is big. Despite our very best efforts, sometimes things spill.

In Vancouver though, Brent Toderian, director of planning for the city, is instigating some major changes. To read Toderian’s blog, press
