<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is it better to take a jet to work than a train?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.djc.com/blogs/BuildingGreen/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.djc.com/blogs/BuildingGreen/?p=1268&amp;owa_from=feed&amp;owa_sid=</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.djc.com/blogs/BuildingGreen/?p=1268#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djc.com/blogs/BuildingGreen/?p=1268#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>Hey, I was looking around for a while searching for Systems Development Life Cycle Phases and I happened upon this site and your post regarding Is it better to take a jet to work than a train?, I will definitely this to my Systems Development Life Cycle Phases bookmarks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I was looking around for a while searching for Systems Development Life Cycle Phases and I happened upon this site and your post regarding Is it better to take a jet to work than a train?, I will definitely this to my Systems Development Life Cycle Phases bookmarks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://www.djc.com/blogs/BuildingGreen/?p=1268#comment-1205</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djc.com/blogs/BuildingGreen/?p=1268#comment-1205</guid>
		<description>I think the most valuable part of this study is expanding the reach of our analysis beyond tailpipe emissions and making sure to include infrastructure embedded energy. 

That being said, I hope the conclusion we can draw from the Boston commuter rail example is that we should work to green our electrical supply (nation wide) so it is powered by low carbon fuels, rather than throw the baby out with the bathwater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the most valuable part of this study is expanding the reach of our analysis beyond tailpipe emissions and making sure to include infrastructure embedded energy. </p>
<p>That being said, I hope the conclusion we can draw from the Boston commuter rail example is that we should work to green our electrical supply (nation wide) so it is powered by low carbon fuels, rather than throw the baby out with the bathwater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
