<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contests galore! Win a DJC tote bag or a green commercial kitchen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.djc.com/blogs/BuildingGreen/?feed=rss2&#038;p=283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.djc.com/blogs/BuildingGreen/?p=283&amp;owa_from=feed&amp;owa_sid=</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.djc.com/blogs/BuildingGreen/?p=283#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djc.com/blogs/BuildingGreen/?p=283#comment-718</guid>
		<description>The desire of people for their own back yard and car.  

You know those eco-calculator things?  They always work better in really dense neighborhoods where transit is prevalent, no one needs a car, and you can pretty much walk everywhere. If you live in multi-family housing, you will necessarily have less space, use fewer materials; and rely on transit for day to day life.  I can't buy a "green" residence 10 miles out in the country, that is 5,000 square feet and uses solar panels.  Every thing going into that residence requires wheeled transport.  Now, a high rise on top of a grocery store with a bus stop outside... that makes sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The desire of people for their own back yard and car.  </p>
<p>You know those eco-calculator things?  They always work better in really dense neighborhoods where transit is prevalent, no one needs a car, and you can pretty much walk everywhere. If you live in multi-family housing, you will necessarily have less space, use fewer materials; and rely on transit for day to day life.  I can&#8217;t buy a &#8220;green&#8221; residence 10 miles out in the country, that is 5,000 square feet and uses solar panels.  Every thing going into that residence requires wheeled transport.  Now, a high rise on top of a grocery store with a bus stop outside&#8230; that makes sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://www.djc.com/blogs/BuildingGreen/?p=283#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djc.com/blogs/BuildingGreen/?p=283#comment-713</guid>
		<description>I think the expense or at least the perceived expense of going green is a huge obstacle. My suggestion to fix this problem would be to have more monetary incentives to build green. I believe there should be tax benefits for the owner that decides to build green as well as for the designer and/or builder that helps them go green. If the designers and builders were rewarded for being involved in green projects they may suggest more green ideas. I think some owners aren’t sure how to go green or don’t know what products are green and if they are presented with ideas or options they may decide to use them more readily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the expense or at least the perceived expense of going green is a huge obstacle. My suggestion to fix this problem would be to have more monetary incentives to build green. I believe there should be tax benefits for the owner that decides to build green as well as for the designer and/or builder that helps them go green. If the designers and builders were rewarded for being involved in green projects they may suggest more green ideas. I think some owners aren’t sure how to go green or don’t know what products are green and if they are presented with ideas or options they may decide to use them more readily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
