DJC Green Building Blog

Neighborhood density in Seattle and Vancouver, B.C. What can we learn from each other?

Posted on April 8, 2010

I've been writing a lot about Vancouver's density recently, in comparison to Seattle's so I know I should move onto another topic. And I promise I will next time. But I just can't resist posting these pictures of my sister's neighborhood, Kerrisdale.

Kerrisdale is about a 15-minute drive away from downtown and a 10-minute drive away from the University of British Columbia. It is a sweet neighborhood, filled with restaurants and shops (but only one bar that I could find). However, what's unique about it isn't the composition of retail. It's the composition of housing types within a two-block radius. I'll let the pictures speak for themselves:

Interesting looking row houses

Mid-rise apartment buildings

Retail

More retail

A large single family home

This neighborhood has nearly every type of housing within two blocks, all mish-mashed up together. That McMansion above? It's located across the street from the first picture of row-houses. The mixing of housing types doesn't feel crowded; it feels like a nice, traditional neighborhood. It's a real urban village.

Seattle has neighborhoods that exemplify this mixed-use concept just as well. Capitol Hill, Lower Queen Anne, Ballard to some degree. But for some reason, the way Kerrisdale did it just felt smoother. Maybe it's primarily an architectural issue? But it feels to an outsider like the apartment building is meant to be located next to a large, single-family house.

To all my density nerds out there, what do you think is Seattle's best example of density that meshes well? It is Capitol Hill or Lower Queen Anne? Any particular street or corridor that really stands out? A really good  recent example, I find, is NK Architect's latest project on Lower Queen Anne called Fourth and Roy. The DJC wrote about it last month here. Basically, the team designed it to consciously fit in with the neighborhood.

In our story, Brandon Nicholson, a principal at NK, said he tries to picture a four-plex craftsman knockoff on the parcel and does not think it would fit in with the neighborhood's character. “In a neighborhood filled with old brick buildings, it might be much more modern in aesthetics but in materials and scale, it's appropriate for the context of Lower Queen Anne.”

Fourth and Roy townhouses in Lower Queen Anne
What do you think? What's Seattle's best example?

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Comments (3) Trackbacks (0)
  1. Great follow up! And another reason why I really need to get up north and better explore Van City.

    In terms of Seattle. Yeah I mean Capitol Hill, LQA, and the U-District are certainly our best examples of beautiful density.

    The North end of Broadway is one of my favorite spots. The new(ish) building at the very end, 700 Broadway (no matter how much others hate it), and Brix mesh quite nicely with the Loveless Building, All Prilgrim’s Church, and the various era-ed one story commercial structures. Go just off Broadway and you still see some cool SFHs, great cottages, and on 10th, some of the coolest townhomes around. Both Joule and Brix transition nicely with cool walk-ups on their backsides. Of course, their are still a few holes, the parking lot and the gas station, and Joule’s size is incredibly out of scale with the rest but I won’t pass too much judgment until I see how the retail works.

    Now this is more of a thought experiment but 1st Hill actually has a pretty cool mix of structures, with high rise to historic SFH (the Fire Station condos on Union are awesome!) Where it fails though is the retail and neighborhood amenities but I think there’s an opportunity, especially on the North End for revitalizing things. Maybe the massive hospitals though are what ruin that?…

  2. Don’t forget about downtown Kirkland. Kirkland always gets overlooked but it is certainly once of the nicest pedestrian oriented urban villages in the whole region.

    This is a bit of a tangent but I think trees really make a huge difference as well. They help to break up the mass of buildings name make it more human oriented. In my opinion BIG street tress that aren’t twigs are the one of the most important things that can be done.

  3. Hi there, i really enjoyed reading your post, nice to know you. keep going ya, thanks for sharing that!


Leave a comment


No trackbacks yet.