The other civic disorder

August 20th, 2015 by Matt Hays
Crossing Second Avenue at Stewart with 10 seconds left, with left turners coming from directly behind. Photo by Matt Hays
Crossing Second Avenue at Stewart with 10 seconds left, with left turners coming from directly behind. Photo by Matt Hays

Finally, some movement on civic disorder and public safety in Downtown Seattle!

No, not the improved Westlake Park and Third Avenue…traffic disorder. Blocked crosswalks, bike lanes, and cross-traffic. Red light runners, whether cars or bikes. Speeding. Free right turns without looking both ways. Cars not stopping for pedestrians at crosswalks, marked or unmarked. Cars edging into crosswalks against the light, drivers texting away. Collectively this is big safety issue, a serious problem for mobility when routes are blocked, and a constant nuisance.

Ok, we’re not dealing with all of that yet. Just “blocking the box,” i.e. blocked cross-streets and crosswalks. But what a breath of fresh air. Per the Seattle Times, “mass citations will begin in October, following a publicity campaign and sign postings in August and September” and tickets are $136.

Watch any street heading toward I-5 at rush hour. It seems like every cycle at every intersection has someone blocking it. A recent Council Transportation Committee briefing by SDOT and SPD notes key intersections with more than one infraction per minute. Sometimes pedestrians have to walk dangerously in traffic lanes. Bicyclists risk serious injury, for example when using the often-blocked Second Avenue bike lane. When a car is even partially in the crosswalk, pedestrians have to worry about getting run over by that car in addition to the other directions, particularly when the car is pointing downhill and one driver stepping off the brake pedal might mean getting hit.

An occasional misjudgment is understandable, but constantly? Is there a possible reason that doesn’t involve name calling? All I can think of is idiots and jerks.

This is a traffic flow problem as well, like streets crossing Mercer, Denny, or Spring eastbound after work, or any southbound avenue before a night game. Cars and buses both get stuck.

Sometimes there’s no traffic jam at all, but cars still creep into crosswalks. Maybe they’re turning right and not looking both ways. Often they’re not turning at all, and simply don’t care about others. Or they decided to drive uphill without the skill to do it safely.

I say throw the book at them. And do the same for red light runners and texters.

D.C. project that houses homeless wins AIA award

June 3rd, 2015 by Lynn

Affordable housing has gotten a lot of press lately in Seattle, so it’s interesting to see how other cities are addressing the issue.
LEO A DALY and and its design partner Studio Twenty Seven Architecture were honored recently for a Washington, D.C. project called La Casa, which provides permanent supportive housing for homeless people.

Photos by Anice Hoachlander
Photos by Anice Hoachlander

The American Institute of Architects gave the firms a 2015 Housing Award for the project in the specialized housing category, which recognizes outstanding design of housing that meets unique needs — in this case, those of the chronically homeless, the architecture firms said in a press release.
The seven-story, 34,946-square-foot building provides permanent housing and supportive services for 40 men. Rather than functioning as a temporary shelter, where residents are housed at night and asked to leave during the day, each unit is a single-person efficiency that supports stability and predictability as tenants transition out of homelessness, the firms said.

La Casa employs the “housing first” service model, which offers permanent housing immediately rather than treating sobriety as a prerequisite, and provides supportive services that reduce the risk of participants returning to homelessness.
“This is an important milestone for the District of Columbia in its continued efforts to redefine the concept of transitional housing,” said Stephen Wright, managing principal of LEO A DALY Washington, D.C. “Most housing for the homeless focuses on meeting a temporary emergency. La Casa is different. Both its service model and the facility design embrace the individual, and serve his needs for rehabilitation and growth.”

The firms said their joint-venture team was challenged by the DC Department of Human Services to create a home rather than an institution, and to meet or exceed the quality of the adjacent market-rate apartments.
The project is situated among the high-density, high-rent apartment buildings of Columbia Heights. The architects said La Casa’s design defies the homeless shelter archetype with ample natural light, airy rooms and striking design.

The ground floor of La Casa includes a lobby, support offices, and a mail area. A community room on the second floor opens onto an outdoor terrace. The typical floor has seven dwelling units, including one ADA-accessible unit. A green roof contributes to the design’s LEED-gold certification. Security is provided by security officers, remotely monitored cameras, and secured door access.
The jury for the 2015 Housing Awards includes: Stephen Schreiber, chair, University of Massachusetts, Amherst; Jon Dick of Archaeo Architects; Kathy Dixon of K. Dixon Architecture; Jody Mcguire of SALA Architects; and Clair Enlow, who writes the “Design Perspectives” column for the Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce.

Seattle might keep going

April 27th, 2015 by Matt Hays

The duration and intensity of the Downtown Seattle development boom is getting a little surprising, beyond even my optimistic guesses from a few years ago. This isn’t just another Seattle-type boom. But here’s the kicker: things seem poised to keep going.

That’s saying something. Between offices, housing, and transportation, this is clearly the busiest we’ve ever been. And we’re four years into it, vs. the typical hard stop far short of that.

The current wave is over 7,000,000 square feet of office and 15,000 housing units by my napkin count, if you gerrymander things up Dexter and Pike/Pine a little, including projects that are at least in active site prep. For offices I believe it’s a record for greater Downtown. For housing it’s a modern-day record by a factor of two.

So why the optimism?

First is tech. Amazon is obvious. But there’s also a pretty stunning wave of national or global tech companies setting up or expanding tech offices in greater Downtown. These companies need talent, and the word is out about Seattle. Even if one of our giants stumbles, is there any doubt that other firms would swoop in to hire waves of their people? This is giving developers the confidence to pursue additional projects at a high rate.

Second is a continued inflow of other companies into Downtown from around the region, for example Weyerhauser and MulvannyG2, as well as Expedia though it’s more distant. Companies value Seattle locations for stated reasons like recruitment, business synergies, public transit, and lunch options. Other local nodes are doing a good job of developing downtown-type amenities and synergies, but greater Downtown Seattle has a strong pull right now. (Bellevue will be fine of course; Downtown Tacoma, Downtown Everett, Kirkland, and others are doing a lot of great things too.)

There will be headwinds, like traffic. As the workforce grows, it’s clear that driving can’t grow much with it because there’s no space. Transit will need to improve a lot. Thankfully every new apartment helps reduce the number of inbound commuters.

On that note, housing will keep booming. New office buildings mean a lot more potential Downtown residents, both directly and indirectly. As more office workers compete for the same street, freeway, and transit space, the idea of a six-block walk to work becomes more attractive for longtime workers too, all the more so as district after district adds more residential mass and related services. Some point out that 25-year-old urbanites often become 30-year-olds with kids that want houses, but good news…today’s 20-year-olds will replace them. And how about baby boomers becoming empty-nesters?

Now about condos. Apartment pessimists often point out that renters might start buying in large numbers, sometimes implying that they’ll start picking houses. But many love urban living, roads aren’t getting any easier, and houses and house-ready properties aren’t cheap. If people start buying, many will choose condos. The old presale-based financing method isn’t viable yet, but equity-rich developers can still get loans, so condos are already coming back. We’re at the very beginning of what could be another wave, minus some of the feeding frenzy or zero-down formats that contributed to the bubble and bust.

The current wave of Asian (often Chinese) residents and investors will help our construction volume substantially, as Seattle becomes more of a global destination. Our prices are half of those in Vancouver or San Francisco, and should remain far lower because we can add supply relatively easily. Further, this is helping our status as a business and tourism center across the board, for example by bringing in more tech workers.

Hotels are also just starting. So far the new inventory only deals with 2014’s overly-high occupancy rate, not future growth. Seattle is becoming a bigger tourist destination, including stunning growth in overseas airline traffic last year and so far this year. We plan to build a second convention center (aka the “addition”). Our growing office base brings visitors as well as relocations and interns who live in hotels for weeks or months. Who knows where our hotel demand will go from here, but “up significantly” seems like a good guess.

Biotechs are talking about a lack of space again, particularly with the old Amgen campus off the table. Hospitals have slowed their construction programs after the last wave, but new significant construction is anticipated again at Virginia Mason, Swedish, and Harborview, including medical offices.

The convention center, a new ferry terminal, and post-viaduct streets and public space projects are all a couple years out. Imagine having those to soften any downturn.

Here’s another reason: we might not have a national crisis or massive overbuilding. People love to quote 1982, 1990, 2001, and 2008 like we’re automatically headed for their equivalent. The first dramatically overbuilt hotels and condos, the second did the same for offices in part because of the CAP initiative that curtailed further development, the third involved both a tech bubble and 9/11, and the fourth involved the mortgage crisis and a narrowly-averted depression. We could have another crisis, like Amazon or the global economy crumbling, but nothing looks imminent. As some point we’ll overbuild in key subsectors, but we have a good chance of avoiding the “brick wall.”

Of course all of that is independent of potential problems like the big fees the City might implement, a lack of construction workers, cost escalation if it exceeds market rents, higher interest rates, and so on. Challenges can happen on many fronts.

So caution, always. But so far so good.

Dan Stubbergaard of COBE Architects to lecture

April 17th, 2015 by Lynn

Dan Stubbergaard, the founder and creative director of COBE Architects in Copenhagen, will give a free lecture at 6 p.m. Wednesday (April 22) at Architecture Hall 147 at the University of Washington.
The UW said COBE is an international architecture and design office whose mission is to contribute to the creation of more decent, equitable, beautiful and sustainable cities. The company seeks to develop specific, innovative solutions that encompass architecture, strategic urban planning, landscape design and research.

COBE Architects designed the Tampere Travel and Service Center for the city of Tampere in Finland.

It has won a number of international competitions since its inception in 2005. Its projects include Nordhavnen, the largest metropolitan redevelopment project in Scandinavia, Norreport Train Station in the center of Copenhagen and The ROCKmagnet, Denmark’s museum of rock music in Roskilde.
COBE Architects designed the Tampere Travel and Service Center (in the pictured rendering) for the city of Tampere in Finland.
In addition to his architectural practice, Stubbergaard has taught at the Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts in Copenhagen and lectures internationally. He is leading a master studio in the UW Department of Architecture in his role as the Scan|Design Foundation 2015 Distinguished Visiting Professor.
His lecture is sponsored by the Scan|Design Foundation and is part of the UW Department of Architecture Spring 2015 Lecture Series.

Paolo Desideri to speak at UW

April 6th, 2015 by Lynn

Paolo Desideri, a professor of architecture and urban design at the “Roma Tre” campus of the University of Rome, will give a free lecture titled “Form as a Resource” at 6 p.m. Wednesday at the University of Washington Architecture Hall 147.
Desideri directs the Ph.D. program on Landscapes of Contemporary Cities. He is also a principal and partner of ABDR Architetti Associati, which he founded in 1982 along with Maria Laura Arlotti, Michele Beccu and Filippo Raimondo. The UW said the work of his internationally recognized practice focuses on large scale infrastructural and cultural projects in the public and private sectors as well as high density housing complexes. The firm designed the new opera house in Florence, Italy, which is shown in the photo (above) by Luigi Filetici.
The talk is part of the UW Department of Architecture Centennial 2015 Spring Lecture Series. For more information, see

My Micro NY is made of prefab modular

February 23rd, 2015 by Lynn

Brookyn firm nArchitects has designed New York’s first micro-apartment complex. The project, called My Micro NY, is made of prefabricated modular units that will be stacked into place this spring and go on the market this summer. The 55 units are 260 to 360 square feet, with rents expected to be $2,000 to $3,000.
For this, renters get kitchenettes, high ceilings, big windows, sliding glass doors, and Juliet balconies along with common spaces and access to storage units.
This is according to a recent story in The New York Times, which says the project is being watched by housing advocates and developers because of its modular construction and because it could mean cheaper housing options in the city where in 2013 about half of all residents were single. A total of 22 of the My Micro NY units will be designated as affordable housing.
The article mentions Seattle as a leader in the micro-apartment movement, and points to the city’s aPodments.

This shows how My Micro NY units are put in place. Images courtesy of nArchitects.
How would you and your stuff fit?
Living in 260 to 360 square feet.

Turn those substation sites into parks

January 6th, 2015 by Lynn
This former substation site at 3904 N.E. 65th St. was sold last year for development. Photos by Cass Turnbull.
Posted by Cass Turnbull

‘It’s not right’.’That’s what I thought when I heard Seattle City Light was going to sell 35 surplus properties to balance their budget. The surplus lots are what are left of 150 electrical substations that became obsolete because of new technology in the 70’s. Today they are typically just an empty concrete pad surrounded by a fence, surrounded by some really nice, mature trees and landscaping. I thought, ‘If you just took down the fence and added a gazebo or a bench and you’d have a great, ready-made pocket park’.

I joined Seattle Green Spaces Coalition, a group formed to Save Our Substations. We soon ran into a stone wall of laws, policies, seriously disinterested departments that said we couldn’t. We were told that legally the property had to be sold. The Parks Department said they didn’t have the money to buy them or maintain them. If we wanted them for greenspace, we’d have to buy them. It’s even crazier, I thought, to ask the public to pay for land that it already owns, so it can be kept for the public good. Over the years some substations have become parks, some have become public housing, but most have been developed by private interests.
Seattle isn’t meeting its current open space goals. With 100,000 to 200,000 new people headed our way over the next few decades, I suspect the amount of open space per person will be much less. The privately owned open spaces are shrinking. Just look at the McMansions, the Three and Four Pack condos, and the apodments. They haven’t enough greenspace to put out a kiddy pool.

I keep wondering where the people living in all those monolithic apartment buildings will go to find something green. Where will the mothers go with their baby buggies, dog walkers go with their dogs? How will they know it is spring if they can’t hear birds or smell the lilacs. Will the kids in those buildings get to play hide and seek, build forts, climb trees, make snowmen, run? These little properties may not amount to much but they can provide solace for the troubled, respite for the weary. They can be place for the young to dream, and a place for the old and the infirm to sit in the sun.

City Light will eventually put this former substation at 7750 28th Ave. N.W. up for sale.

Photos by Cass Turnbull

So I’m hoping that the City Council, courageously being lead by our friend, Tom Rasmsson, can find a way through, or under, or around the stone wall. Because we need all the open space we can get.

A partial list of substations is on the website.

Cass Turnbull is a lifetime resident of Seattle and founder of TreePAC, a political action committee to advocate for the Urban Forest.

Volunteers to host holiday dinner for Nickelsville encampment

December 23rd, 2014 by Lynn

Volunteers of the Low Income Housing Institute will host a holiday dinner at 6:30 p.m. tonight (Dec. 23) for residents of Nickelsville, a tent city encampment in Seattle for homeless people.
The volunteers will also distribute donated winter clothing, blankets and toiletries at the event at the International District Community Center at 719 Eighth Ave. S.
Pastor Steve Olsen of the Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd will give a blessing. The church is the religious sponsor for Nickelsville, which is at 1010 S. Dearborn St. Chris Koh will represent the owner of the property.

Photo by Sharon Lee

In a press release, LIHI said the encampment consists of tents and simple sleeping structures for 40 homeless people and their children. It includes a kitchen/dining tent, cooking area, donation tent, hand washing station, and Honey Buckets.
Nickelsville formed in 2008 as shelters were full, LIHI said. It is a self-managed community of homeless men, women, children and pets.
LIHI said The Emergency Task Force on Unsheltered Homelessness has recommended to Seattle Mayor Ed Murray that additional homeless encampments be allowed to be operated by experienced shelter and service providers on public and private property in the city. This would be in addition to those sponsored by religious or faith-based institutions.

People can make a donation to Nickelsville at 1010 S. Dearborn St., at the LIHI main office at 2407 First Ave. in Seattle, or online at

Microhousing: good or bad?

October 22nd, 2014 by sera

How Small Are They?

Microhousing: good or bad?

Did you know Seattle is the pioneer in microhousing – that is apartments with an average size of 150 square feet?  An article in Politico says this is because of our real estate boom, with a growing population of millennials, permissive city codes. Because of those permissive codes, Seattle’s microhousing units have the smallest square footage in the country.

Not everyone loves seeing these microhousing units popping up in their neighborhoods, tucked in between single-family housing.  What looks like a townhouse with eight small apartments could actually contain 64 units.

As reported in the DJC, Seattle City Council approved new regulations requiring micro units have a minimum of 220 square feet, two sinks and a food preparation area that includes “a cooking appliance.”

Sightline Daily blog says the city’s going backwards with these new regulations. Sightline Executive Director Alan Durning asks, why do we need two sinks in a 220 square foot apartment?

What do you think?



Will Council Raise Rents for Everyone?

September 18th, 2014 by Matt Hays

It’s a repeated movie scene: soccer player dribbles down the field, overcoming all opposition and ignoring the shouting onlookers….and scores in the wrong goal.

City Council members say they want Seattle to be affordable, but the Land Use Committee is blindly heading the wrong way. They’re going to increase residential and commercial rents via massive development fees and new restrictions on the best way the market can provide cheap housing.

“Massive” is the right term. Basically, all multifamily and commercial developments would be subject to fees ranging from $7 to $22 per square foot (or alternatively $5 to $16), depending on neighborhood. Averaging out the higher version, that might be a 5% increase in development cost. Or development onsite, which tends to be much more expensive. The fees would apply to the whole building, vs. the current method of fees only above the old height limits. Houses would have no fees of course.

Micro project on East John, by DPD

The result is obvious. Higher rents won’t apply to just new buildings, but to every person or company that rents in Seattle. In a growing city, rents tend to follow replacement cost, plus a premium if vacancies get too tight. Replacement cost for all types of space would go much higher, even with a likely dampening of land prices. The fees would reduce construction until demand pushed rents up enough, then we’d start building again. It would be another “great reset” to higher rents. Some people counter that incomes are flat, but that’s not very relevant; in high-demand cities, people tend to pay a larger percentage of their income. The question of “what will the market bear” for a necessary product is based on customers’ pain thresholds, and prices rise until enough people let go.

Fee proponents seem to think the projects will keep flowing and costs don’t translate to prices. This is pure ignorance. Even without fees, the average project is on the edge of happening or not happening even in the weeks before it breaks ground. What will interest rates be? Will the market soften in the next two years? Is someone at DPD going to require an expensive change? Will the equity partner take the leap necessary to build offices on spec? We contractors hear about many projects that never even make the DJC because the pro forma doesn’t work. Once projects are public, or even permitted, a great many still never happen. There’s good reason behind that, and not just that returns might be disappointing – sometimes developers and financiers lose their shirts, as many did a few years ago.

Owners of existing buildings and homes would celebrate the fees of course (seriously, does the Land Use Committee know this?). Less competition means higher rents and higher building values. My condo would be worth more too. Commercial building investors love to buy buildings in areas with “high barriers to entry” for this reason.

So, rents would go up substantially for 130,000 renting households in Seattle (my guesstimate) and any business that rents space. That’s quite a price for a relatively small number of subsidized units.

We can do much better. There are methods that don’t restrict housing supply or punish companies for locating in Seattle. The existing housing levy is part of that; can it be expanded? How about making it easier for homeowners to build accessory units? How about micros? Or expanding the zones where townhouses can be built, even a little? Each can help fill part of the affordability gap for different types of people.

But most of those things are too scary for the Land Use Committee. The loudest voters want free, empty parking in front of their houses, and no “renters” (sometimes a euphemism) living nearby. Now micros, despite their popularity, have been slapped down already, and the Committee (motto: “You’re out of LUC”) wants to all but destroy the model entirely, with added parking, sinks, square footage, and entitlement process.

Some of that is understandable in the context of negotiating tradeoffs, like parking in certain zones, or even the design review process that adds costs, duration, and uncertainty to every project in Seattle. Other parts make no sense at all. Who does it help to outlaw the smallest micros, which are basically the size of a dorm room, minus the snoring roommate? If someone can afford 150 square feet but not 220, it’s off to the friend’s couch? (PS, as a donor to some of our outstanding nonprofits, I’d like to see money spread further with smaller units, like micro sizes for single people and micro+bedroom for families, with a focus on temporary rather than lifetime housing.)

About micro prices: Some say $700 isn’t really affordable (I’ve heard numbers from $600 to $1,000 for bigger units). It’s not low enough for everyone, and many people aren’t suited for micros. But it’s definitely a gap in our housing supply, and these units are popular. It’s notable that rents often include utilities, internet, and significant shared space. And don’t forget that the market is otherwise averaging over $1,400 for apartments. All things considered, $700 is a great price to live in a core Seattle neighborhood.

Hopefully the LUC and full council will listen to people beyond its own echo chamber and the consultants who want us to emulate the nation’s most expensive cities. The Mayor has shown signs of being reasonable. Let’s not look back on 2014 as the year we flubbed ourselves into higher rents for all.