It’s not a landmark, but developer won’t demolish it

The Southwest Design Review Board will check in tonight on a strangely familiar West Seattle development.

charletonmixeduse1.jpg
As built in 1927

The project is at 3811 California Ave. W. The developer initially proposed tearing down the Charleston Court building to build an entirely new project. Then, partway through design review, Charleston Court was nominated for landmark status. The project went on hold for a year.

The landmark board voted in April against landmarking the 1927 building, designed by William Whiteley, clearing the way for demolition. (Original building shown above.)

But the developer is back with new plans that will give the neighbors deja vu.

charletonmixeduse2.jpg
What the developer wants
The new design (seen at left) proposes retaining the wings of the original building and the building’s courtyard.

The rear portion of the old building would be torn down, but the developer wants to use that brick to create a new building front between the wings.

Steven Butler and Paul Cesmat bought the building in 2007. Project architect is Nicholson Kovalchick.

Tags: ,

  • http://westseattleblog.com WSB

    It’s actually Charlestown Court.
    And the wings won’t just be retained, they will be raised and slightly moved.
    Comprehensive coverage here from our coverage of the first news of this design change at a neighborhood meeting two nights ago.

  • Pingback: links for 2008-06-13 | The Computer Vet Weblog

  • shawna

    Hi WSB, according to the records I looked at, the building was referred to as both Charleston and Charlestown Court (that was in the landmark nomination). But I must admit, I’ve never lived in West Seattle, so I don’t know what’s more colloquially appropriate.

    The developer is currently referring to the new plans as Charlestown Mixed Use.

    WSB is right, the new design proposal calls for moving both wings 12 feet east and raising them 6 to 7 feet each. I recommend reading the entire proposal, linked in the post- it’s definitely an interesting proposal. And the link WSB provides has some great context, too.