Archive for July, 2008

On Ebay this week: Seattle’s toilets

Friday, July 11th, 2008

Sad to see Seattle’s futuristic stainless steel toilets flushed from our streets? Then bid for them on Ebay!

Five automatic toilets being removed by the city because of maintenance costs and problems with drug use and prostitution will be listed on Ebay within the next week.

toilet_closeup_web.jpg
Insert toilet humor here

The German-made Hering-Bau toilets are being listed separately with a minimum bid of $89,000 each, said Pat Miller, who handles disposal of public property for the city. Comparable new units are now selling for around $200,000, said Hugh O’Neill, Hering International’s North American sales director.

Miller said Seattle has received some inquiries in recent weeks from prospective buyers but none serious enough to move forward with. He said at least 20 cities are in the market for automatic toilets.

The single-stall stainless steel units are accessible and have sensors for hand-washing and flushing. They are designed to seal their pneumatic doors to clean the floor and toilet after every flush, and to prevent people from entering while in use.

The city council overrode a mayoral veto in 2001 to get the toilets installed throughout the downtown area for use by tourists, shoppers and the homeless.

But a report released in March said the toilets are the least cost-effective way for the city to provide public restroom services and said they were magnets for illegal activity. Read more about it at DJC.com.

The toilets cost about $544,000 to install and about $128,000 in annual operations and maintenance costs. In some other cities using the toilets, those costs were offset by advertisements posted on and within the units. Seattle law precluded the ads on our units.

O’Neill said Seattle is the first city he’s seen vote to remove the toilets. Most other U.S. cities offset their costs with advertisements, O’Neill said, and many European cities install the toilets as pay units to cover costs.

Toilets were recently installed in Los Angeles and are soon to be installed in Toronto, O’Neill said. Other cities with the toilets include Detroit, New York and Atlanta.

More than 3,000 of Ebay’s current auctions feature the word “toilet,” but Miller said he thinks Seattle’s Hering-Baus will be the only ones of their kind listed.

The city is holding a hearing at 3 p.m. on Wednesday, July 23 at City Hall to get public feedback on the sale. The toilets will be listed on 20 day auctions by city consultant bidaloo.

Can zoning save Seattle from going Stepford?

Friday, July 11th, 2008

Former council staffer Roger Valdez wrote an interesting column on growth and change in today’s P-I.

Growth is coming, Valdez says; lots of it. So how do we accommodate all these new people, their new houses and cars and needs, without losing all of our Sunset Bowls, Chubby and Tubbys, all of our views of Mt. Rainier and Lake Union, all of our Seattleness? Is that even possible?

old-downtown.jpg
Not your grandmother's Seattle anymore

Valdez says the city would be wise to expand the Transfer of Development Rights program throughout the city so owners of landmark properties could make money, developers could keep building high and we could all hold on to a more diverse cityscape.

That’s an idea council has been kicking around for the past few months, but legislation hasn’t yet been discussed.

He also recommends developer incentives for preserving existing uses, aimed at earmarking some space for the arts, cultural and community spaces that are being pushed out with rising rents and skyrocketing development potential.

Valdez says increasing the type of uses we protect is a good way to protect uses that don’t really “pencil out” but add to the city’s bottom line.

In some cases, Valdez said, the city could even forgo the code and let neighborhoods and developers work together to create innovative projects that fit better with neighborhoods and protect the uses we value.

I’m not sure I really see developers and neighbors joining hands on many projects. But as our region aggressively plans for growth, people like Valdez suggest that more mitigation measures are needed to make sure we don’t change entirely.

In-city density is planning’s penicillin for sprawl. Nobody wants sprawl, but how do we know when we’ve gotten too aggressive with our treatment?

“The bigger a building is, the harder it is to make wonderful”

Thursday, July 10th, 2008

In addition to a bubble-gum story about hot new twenty-somethings and an almost-too-thorough play-by-play of the fall

the-national-center-for-the-performing-art-designed-by-paul-andreu.jpg
The National Center for Performing Arts, by Paul Andrieu
of Bear Stearns, this month’s Vanity Fair has an exploration of the feats of architectural genius and engineering prowess on display at Olympic sites in Beijing.

Accompanied by some really breathtaking shots by Stephen Wilkes and Todd Eberle, the article fawns over Beijing’s “daring commissions” and “creatively humanistic design.”

An interesting point made by Kurt Andersen in the piece: The Olympics often bring a flood of outstanding architecture to its host city, but in the case of Beijing, that effort has bled into buildings that could otherwise be mundane.

rem-koolhaas-china-central-television-office-building.jpg
Rem Koolhaas' China Central Television office building
These type of additions are usually hastily erected, while the gloss is turned elsewhere.

Like Foster + Partners’ new $3.8 billion terminal at the Beijing airport and Rem Koolhaas’ China Central Television office building (shown at left), building types that Andersen says “very seldom turn out better than mediocre.”

Andersen embarks on an exploration of the architecture and the phenomenon, complete with comparisons to turn-of-the century New York, Koolhaas “snarling” and the author finding himself an “apologist” for the authoritarian regime and its role in the transformation. A fun read.

The bad, the ugly, the uglier. . .

Wednesday, July 9th, 2008

After three years of review, the city is still working on a proposal aimed at making townhouses less ugly. Mayor Greg Nickels announced Tuesday he wants the proposal to include a required design review for every new townhouse.

townhouses-in-a-row.jpg
Are these our entries or our backdoors?

Many of the townhouses now standing did not go through design review. That’s because they either didn’t have enough units to trigger a review, or developers permitted different portions of the project separately, avoiding the review.

It’s unclear what exactly would change if city planners reviewed the aesthetics of townhouses. Nickels says it will let designers be more flexible and creative. DPD is still working out the details. Read more about the proposal here, and a critique by Livable Seattle here (townhouse pictures at left and bottom are from Livable Seattle’s own review of townhouse aesthetics, included in the report).

mcmansion.jpg
Keeping up with the Joneses

Meanwhile, council president Richard Conlin has a proposal of his own aimed at mitigating the ugliness of a different kind of new construction. His proposal targets “McMansions” and takes aim at specific issues: height, scale and garages.

New formulas and guidelines are set for calculating height and lot coverage allowances. That would stop the practice of averaging neighboring heights to build higher and of using a footprint allowance set for a bigger lot size.

Garages would be limited to a certain amount of the facade and builders would get a size bonus for getting parking and garages entirely out of sight. The proposal had its first vetting in a council committee today. No legislation has been introduced.

The multifamily code update is more complicated, with dozens of prescriptions aimed at improving the look of townhouses, like shorter fences, pedestrian entries and more windows in front. It also cuts out parking requirements for some townhouses in higher density zones, meaning those townhouses could be built without multiple garages and driveways,

townhouse-driveways.jpg
Garages that cars can't get to or fit within
presumably allowing for more space for yards and gardens.

Interestingly, it also widens townhouse entry driveways and parking spaces, meaning the driveway footprint will be bigger. That’s because some townhouses were designed so badly that driveways are inaccessible.

The proposal does not cut townhouse height limits. In some zones, developers will be able to build higher if they earmark a certain number of units for people making median income. They will also have to use green building techniques.

Read the whole story at DJC.com.

The trail less traveled

Tuesday, July 1st, 2008

When I lived in Boise, I was four blocks from a greenbelt that took me all the way to downtown or to my office five miles across town. I even got to ride over a cool old railroad bridge and along the Boise River.

This was in a town where the buses (I think there were four total) stopped running at 5:45 p.m. and cars registered in the suburbs did not need emissions testing.

burke-gilman-on-the-east-side.jpg
The Burke Gilman through Redmond

In Seattle, where many people live without cars, I can ride bits and pieces of various lovely trails — but I have to cross into vehicular traffic at multiple points to complete my daily commute.

The Burke-Gilman had a big section completed between downtown Ballard and Golden Gardens just this spring, but many gaps remain there and elsewhere.

A proposed $140 million 2008 parks levy prioritizes filling in some of those gaps. A committee tasked with crafting the levy for the Seattle City Council went beyond green space and parks and recommended spending $8 million to fill in some missing links.

The committee wants to extend the Burke-Gilman and Duwamish bicycle trails, and build an overpass at Thomas Street.

None of these proposals are new. These projects are all included in the Seattle Bicycle Master Plan and in Bands of Green. The committee said in its report it was looking for projects that would promote healthy living and could be completed within the six-year timeframe.

Nearly $4 million of the money would go to filling in holes on the Burke-Gilman in Ballard. $2 million would go to trail improvements along the Duwamish. $1.5 million would go to building an overpass for bikes and pedestrians from Myrtle Edwards Park to Queen Anne. The remaining $600,000 would go to building trails in the Kiwanis Ravine overlook near Discovery Park.

It still leaves quite a few gaps in the system, but targets some of the city’s fastest growing neighborhoods, maybe even making two-wheel commuters out of new Seattleites.

Council will review the committee’s report at 2:30 p.m. Monday, July 7 and hold a public hearing at 5:30 p.m. Thursday, July 10.

Read more about the levy at DJC.com

Historic preservation training tonight (July 1)

Tuesday, July 1st, 2008

Heather MacIntosh, president of D.C.-based lobbying group Preservation Action, will be back in her old stomping grounds tonight for a lecture on grassroots advocacy. macintosh.jpg

The lecture starts at 5:30 p.m. tonight (July 1) at the First United Methodist Church Sanctuary at 811 Fifth Ave. It’s free and open to the public. The event is sponsored by Daniels Development.

MacIntosh was a preservation advocate for Historic Seattle and was deputy director of Historylink. org, the online encyclopedia of Seattle and Washington history.