Could Interbay become Seattle’s Pearl District?

My travels this week led me to Portland’s Pearl District. I couldn’t help but think about places in Seattle that could benefit from broad changes like those that created the Pearl. We don’t have Tax Increment Financing, but we do have Interbay 

Recently the Interbay/Dravus rezone passed out of the Planning Land Use and Neighborhoods Committee, but has run into some trouble on the way to the full council. 

Should the rezone be subject to the pending incentive zoning proposal? The mayor seems to want this to happen as do some councilmembers. Additionally the Seattle Department of Transportation seems to have some issues with infrastructure missing as part of the rezone. At the PLUNC meeting where the rezone passed, concerns were raised that sidewalks and road improvements wouldn’t happen. 

But Interbay’s time has come.  

Like the warehouse district in Portland that became the Pearl District, Interbay is now a mix of low-intensity uses with no housing to speak of. Because of its location, more people living here is not sparking dissent from neighboring single family neighborhoods. Even the industrial community seems to be supporting the changes.

 The council needs to avoid getting into a battle over the many ‘what ifs’ that could hold this up. The project should look at non-traditional sidewalks to address the SDOT concerns, and a reasonable target needs to be set for affordability. Sustainable reuse of buildings like the Ecotrust building in the Pearl should also be encouraged.  

The council should take the time to get these things sorted out and set some indicators to measure whether the rezone lives up to our expectations. But we’ve waited long enough. 

 

Tags: , ,

  • Steve

    The Interbay area (at least, the part affected by the rezone) is much smaller than the Pearl, which is good in ways (it may feel completed sooner) but bad in others (even when built out, it may feel isolated). I’d love to see some quality 10-12 story apartment buildings get built there, especially if the transit connections to downtown and Ballard can be improved (the 15 and 18 are frequent, but they’re slow and occasionally rowdy).

  • Matt the Engineer

    Build a streetcar out to it, and a pedestrian bridge to Ballard. Then it becomes an extension of Ballard and is almost walkable (“almost walkable” is perfect for streetcars). Don’t forget to build up by the water in Ballard as well.

    Does anyone know why we don’t value water in the northwest? Anywhere else and you’d see highrise condos overlooking the locks.