<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Backyard cottages for all</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.djc.com/blogs/SeattleScape/2009/03/19/backyard-cottages-for-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.djc.com/blogs/SeattleScape/2009/03/19/backyard-cottages-for-all/</link>
	<description>This blog will focus on how Seattle shapes itself — its design, its planning and its aspirations.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: samiam</title>
		<link>http://www.djc.com/blogs/SeattleScape/2009/03/19/backyard-cottages-for-all/#comment-852</link>
		<dc:creator>samiam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 03:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djc.com/blogs/SeattleScape/?p=1684#comment-852</guid>
		<description>The new expanded ordinance took affect on friday. The limit of 50 was been removed prior to approval. For more information on the expanded ordinance plus the complete text see my blog http://seattlebackyardcottage.blogspot.com. For a free analysis of your lot visit Microhouse at http://microhousenw.com we offer standard plans for compliant 800 sq. ft. cottages. and complete design services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new expanded ordinance took affect on friday. The limit of 50 was been removed prior to approval. For more information on the expanded ordinance plus the complete text see my blog <a href="http://seattlebackyardcottage.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://seattlebackyardcottage.blogspot.com</a>. For a free analysis of your lot visit Microhouse at <a href="http://microhousenw.com" rel="nofollow">http://microhousenw.com</a> we offer standard plans for compliant 800 sq. ft. cottages. and complete design services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt the Engineer</title>
		<link>http://www.djc.com/blogs/SeattleScape/2009/03/19/backyard-cottages-for-all/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt the Engineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djc.com/blogs/SeattleScape/?p=1684#comment-618</guid>
		<description>This is great news.  50 isn't enough, but it's a good start.  This is one of the few ways Seattle can increase its density without demolishing our beautiful old single family homes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great news.  50 isn&#8217;t enough, but it&#8217;s a good start.  This is one of the few ways Seattle can increase its density without demolishing our beautiful old single family homes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawna Gamache</title>
		<link>http://www.djc.com/blogs/SeattleScape/2009/03/19/backyard-cottages-for-all/#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawna Gamache</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djc.com/blogs/SeattleScape/?p=1684#comment-617</guid>
		<description>You can read what Southeast neighbors had to say about cottages in their backyards &lt;a href="http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/static/SE%20BYC%20Nhood%20survey%20results%2012.2_LatestReleased_DPDS015776.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can read what Southeast neighbors had to say about cottages in their backyards <a href="http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/static/SE%20BYC%20Nhood%20survey%20results%2012.2_LatestReleased_DPDS015776.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Hays</title>
		<link>http://www.djc.com/blogs/SeattleScape/2009/03/19/backyard-cottages-for-all/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djc.com/blogs/SeattleScape/?p=1684#comment-616</guid>
		<description>Of COURSE we should allow these.  Lots of them, with less restriction than discussed above.  

Cottages, mother-in-laws, garage homes, and other "little" measures should be a big part of how we address affordability.  Each cottage helps the cottage resident, the property owner, and every other local resident (by keeping supply up with demand).  

Meanwhile they'll provide a little extra support for neighborhood business districts, which benefit every time additional residents move in, particularly when the new residents aren't in a new building with unneeded retail space on a non-retail street.  

Some neighborhood residents will howl at the idea, and they'll cause the City to do something wimpy.  Basically we'll be held hostage by people who think they're classier than others, or who care more about their parking than affordability, in both scenarios based in signifcant part on misconceptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of COURSE we should allow these.  Lots of them, with less restriction than discussed above.  </p>
<p>Cottages, mother-in-laws, garage homes, and other &#8220;little&#8221; measures should be a big part of how we address affordability.  Each cottage helps the cottage resident, the property owner, and every other local resident (by keeping supply up with demand).  </p>
<p>Meanwhile they&#8217;ll provide a little extra support for neighborhood business districts, which benefit every time additional residents move in, particularly when the new residents aren&#8217;t in a new building with unneeded retail space on a non-retail street.  </p>
<p>Some neighborhood residents will howl at the idea, and they&#8217;ll cause the City to do something wimpy.  Basically we&#8217;ll be held hostage by people who think they&#8217;re classier than others, or who care more about their parking than affordability, in both scenarios based in signifcant part on misconceptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Backyard cottages for all</title>
		<link>http://www.djc.com/blogs/SeattleScape/2009/03/19/backyard-cottages-for-all/#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>Backyard cottages for all</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djc.com/blogs/SeattleScape/?p=1684#comment-615</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more here: Backyard cottages for all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more here: Backyard cottages for all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
