<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mag: OSKA among world&#8217;s &#8216;Top 10&#8242;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.djc.com/blogs/SeattleScape/2009/05/04/oska-makes-mags-top-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.djc.com/blogs/SeattleScape/2009/05/04/oska-makes-mags-top-10/</link>
	<description>This blog will focus on how Seattle shapes itself — its design, its planning and its aspirations.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: holz</title>
		<link>http://www.djc.com/blogs/SeattleScape/2009/05/04/oska-makes-mags-top-10/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>holz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 06:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djc.com/blogs/SeattleScape/?p=1943#comment-660</guid>
		<description>haha. oh that was great for a laugh.

SOM is number one? really?
de Portzamparc innovative?

oska has some decent work, but little that could qualify as innovative. a lot of cliches, but little innovation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha. oh that was great for a laugh.</p>
<p>SOM is number one? really?<br />
de Portzamparc innovative?</p>
<p>oska has some decent work, but little that could qualify as innovative. a lot of cliches, but little innovation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
