Good times with Amtrak

We love travel, and we hate it. Seeing places is great…getting to anything distant is an ordeal. Flying means waiting, invasive security, and being wedged into a seat made for people less than 6’1″, plus hours of time wasted just getting to and from the airport at each end. Driving is tiring, even without traffic, and standing up means stopping first. The saving graces are anticipation, aerial views, and roadside pancakes.

Taking Amtrak can be a revelation. If you’re already downtown, you can simply walk to the station. It’s best to show up 15 minutes early of course! The seats in coach are like business class on a plane, but with more leg room. You can head to the head or grab a beer or cup of soup from the dining car anytime you want. You can even be productive, keeping up with email, or playing a sketch game as my coworkers and I did the other day.

People have apparently noticed these advantages. Our trains to Portland and back were full both ways.

Train riders don’t get waited on. But the service I’ve gotten, in a handful of trips, has been excellent. Mostly this has been friendly efficiency, like flight attendants who aren’t being pushy. Where Amtrak staff have really shined is when something has gone wrong.

Two of us returned on Friday, and traveled by business class rather than coach. We’d stood in the wrong seat assignment line in the terminal, and been assigned coach seats. This became clear when we got to Coach Car 8. A worker was inside helping passengers stack luggage. We pointed out the error. He smiled and jumped into action, guiding us to his golf cart, securing new seat assignments by radio (with a full train), and taking us right to Car 1. Five minutes later we even had $3 menu coupons. Taking the blame and focusing on a solution without being totally wrong…that is service.

The Seattle-Portland route’s popularity is great evidence that rail can be popular even at “regular” speeds, at least between big cities at intermediate distances where the timing isn’t much longer (if at all) than other methods. Our region has the right idea for short-term improvements. Aided by federal grant money, we’re supposed to get two additional trips each way, along with continued small improvements that will improve speed. I’m ok with the controversial move to an inland route in Tacoma vs. the scenic waterfront route. Some of the improvements will help freight and commuter rail too.

Long term, the math is probably good to establish true high speed rail on the Portland-Seattle-Vancouver route, or at least much of the route. Whether a new ROW or incremental improvements to the existing, the cost would be huge. But it should prove to be good value, compared the many billions it would require to improve three airports, build a second Seattle airport, and expand highways, all of which are projected by some in the coming decades. A train every 30 minutes each way would replace quite a few commuter planes and cars on the highway. Further, it would help a lot of people reduce or eliminate their car use, and gain those personal savings.

(If you have an opinion or experience to share please do!)

  • Lawrence kight

    Great article. I used to take the Southern Crescent between Atlanta and Hattiesburg, MS. when I was in graduate school at USM. I always enjoyed the ride. However, I have yet to take the train to and from Portland. Your article has reminded me that I need to make the trip, preferably with my bike. Thanks.

  • Matt the Engineer

    The one reason I’ve heard that some don’t take the train is frequency. It’s a whole lot of effort to get to the airport, but once you’re there planes leave for Portland constantly – and this is useful when you’re running down to Portland for a meeting of indeterminate length. Trains already compete with planes for this trip on speed (considering the whole trip), beat air travel in terms of price and quality, and blow them out of the water in terms of carbon footprint and futureproofing (peak oil will hit, and it’ll hit our airports hard). If they can compete on frequency as well then I can’t imagine a reason someone would choose to fly.

  • Catherine

    We took the train to/from Whitefish MT last year for a ski trip and it was GREAT! No baggage fuss or fees, very acceptable food (hot, tasty, healthy options), the one unruly passenger was handled without delaying the train, and took less time than flying there would have. I was moderately confused by the amount of time at the stops (I’m used to Europe where stops are much faster), but we’ll be back.

  • Matt the Engineer

    [Catherine] I love the idea of making a ski trip on the train. I’ve done the MT run before in the summer for a weekend hike without having to miss any work.

    Here’s how that goes: Bring suitcase to work on Friday, and leave a little early. Walk to train station and hop on the Empire Builder. Watch the beautiful scenery go by, have a nice meal, then retire to a mini-sleeper (very comfortable, and I love sleeping on a train). Wake up, have breakfast, then hop off at the east side of Glacier National Park and spend the day hiking. Hop back on in the evening going the other direction and be back in Seattle on Sunday by noon.

    This ends up being much cheaper and far more enjoyable than a flight and several nights in a hotel room. I would imagine a ski trip would work more or less the same.

  • http://www.etrrker34erturt7i.com Mackenzie Ferries

    They have to comprehend which that is an issue. I’m thinking which if these folks previously haven’t addressed this, they should in the close to long term. Fb has accomplished with with the Fan pages.