March 7, 2008
Henry
|
The popular debate about Johnson generally involves the court's evisceration of the century-old Washington concept of “prejudice” in any requirement to comply with the written notice requirements in a construction contract — and the question of whether the lack of compliance actually disadvantaged the project owner. That debate involves theoretical and historic aspects of contract law and considerations of the effect of legal precedent, concepts that have little to do with a true analysis of what is fair and what is not.
. . .
Previous columns: