November 10, 2005
A modern way to fortify an old building
By DAVE RUTHERFORD
The historic town of Port Townsend sprang to life in the late 1800s with high hopes of becoming a major trading port. Part of that growth included the town's 1892 City Hall, which can be found at the north end of the waterfront.
The brick City Hall was originally built with a fire hall, jail, court and city council chambers. Years of deterioration and deferred maintenance have taken their toll, and the building's steeply pitched third floor with detailed corner towers was removed in the 1940s in favor of a flat roof. The reason? A lack of funding for roof repairs.
In the early 1990s, the Jefferson County Historical Society began working on plans to renovate City Hall, where it operates a museum.
An analysis revealed the scope and cost were significantly beyond the society's reach. After much discussion, the city agreed to cover the costs of the shell and core elements, including seismic upgrades, brick repointing, window restoration and a new flat roof.
Two projects become one
ARC Architects was initially hired to design a city administration building with a civic presence adjacent to City Hall. ARC was later asked to include the rehabilitation of City Hall as part of the project and involve Kate Johnson, a local preservation architect.
In 2002, the design team found itself working on both projects separately. There was much deliberation to find the best solutions within the constraints of two complicated projects with inadequate budgets.
In addition to the extensive exterior renovation, City Hall required seismic strengthening by adding new lateral elements to brace the south and west walls, and by attaching its wood floors to unreinforced masonry walls. The project scope included ADA upgrades and a second means of egress to meet building code.
The design team also agreed that the long-term goal should include a reproduction of the ornate third floor that was removed over 50 years ago. That idea is on hold, pending fund-raising of about $3 million.
While plans for City Hall were being put together, the design team was struggling to meet the new administration building's tight budget and need for more program space. As the team wrestled with minimizing the impact to City Hall and creating more program space for city administration, the advantages of combining the two buildings became obvious. The new administration building could provide the required accessibility, new rest rooms and a second means of egress without taking up valuable space in City Hall; City Hall could provide needed program space that the addition could not afford. All of this could be done for less money than if the two projects were executed separately.
Beefing up City Hall
The need to strengthen City Hall's south and west unreinforced masonry walls was a significant challenge. The numerous openings in these ornate facades significantly weaken their ability to resist the lateral forces of an earthquake.
Many options were explored. One involved core drilling the brick pilasters between the windows and placing post-tensioned steel rods to strengthen the masonry piers. This would have been expensive, and drilling would have been difficult and risky.
Another solution was to strengthen the walls with steel frames. While a steel-braced frame resolved the lateral forces economically, the city was not in favor of the diagonal bracing that would be visible inside the historic faÃ§ade. This would also significantly disrupt the interior spaces of City Hall and require considerable restoration work to conceal the steel frame.
The team then explored using the administration building as a buttress to support City Hall during a seismic event. A large steel brace frame was designed for the administration building that connects to continuous steel drag struts at the second floor and roof of City Hall, and to a large concrete footing under the new building. By structurally tying the two buildings together, flexible seismic joints were eliminated, allowing simple direct connections between the buildings at all levels.
This innovative solution is an example of how a new adjacent structure can be used to alleviate the visible impact of required seismic bracing on a historic structure and maintain the seismic integrity of the system.
There was still the issue of support for the south facade. Again, the installation of a steel frame was not the preferred solution inside City Hall. It was decided that a wood partition wall near the south face could be replaced with a concrete shear wall. A large concrete footing and helical anchors in the basement of City Hall support this shear wall.
Construction is expected to be completed in January 2006. The exploration process and refined solutions are an excellent example of design integration and team collaboration.
Copyright ©2009 Seattle Daily Journal and DJC.COM.
Comments? Questions? Contact us.