 |
Subscribe / Renew |
 |
Contact Us |
| ► Subscribe to our Free Weekly Newsletter | |
Construction Bids
| home | Welcome, sign in or click here to subscribe. | login |
Business
|
Subscriber content preview
November 5, 2010
Andrew Bergh: More reasons not to represent yourself
By ANDREW BERGH
Special to the Journal
Special to the Journal
There oughta be a law against pro se litigants.
For the record, “pro se” refers to someone who represents herself in a lawsuit. Since they usually have little or no legal training, one might think pro se parties would be a lawyer's dream opponent. After all, the bigger the mismatch, the easier to win the case — right?
. . .
To read this story in full login or purchase a subscription.
Previous columns:
- Andrew Bergh: Victim says car wreck cost him a normal life, 10-15-2010
- Andrew Bergh: Court says Betcha.com is an illegal bookmaker, 09-24-2010
- Andrew Bergh: Bothell case becomes a tale of two counties, 09-10-2010
- Andrew Bergh: Defendants who seek DNA testing face procedural tests, 08-20-2010
- Andrew Bergh: When daughter drives drunk, is mom liable?, 07-30-2010
- Andrew Bergh: Groom wins dispute over a pre-nup in Farsi, 07-16-2010
- Andrew Bergh: Crash victim learns lube job doesn't include a tire check, 06-25-2010
- Andrew Bergh: Chat with a cop leads Yakima man to court, 06-11-2010